WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "demolition plan"
470 result(s) found
Found 470 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
22 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...
- 374
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Revalidate NOC for Construction Near Air Force Station. Refusal based on non-existent policy and without hearing violates principles of natural justice and Article 14.
23 Oct 2023The petitioner, Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati, sole proprietor of Nyati Housing, challenged letters dated 12th May 2021 and 20th September 2021 issued by Resp...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Government Corporation in Eviction Case — Corporation Held to be Government Undertaking Under West Bengal Government Premises Act. Leased Plots Part of Larger Industrial Estate Constitute Government Premises, Termination of Lease Valid.
18 Mar 2020The case involves an appeal by the West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (the Corporation) and its functionaries against an order ...
- 167
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging High Power Committee's Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute. The Court Upholds the Committee's Power Under Section 3B(3) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, to Direct Clubbing of Overlapping Schemes and Conduct Fresh Survey of Eligible Slum Dwellers.
9 Jul 2015The case involves a group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over a slum rehabilitation scheme under the Maharashtr...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.
9 Oct 2013The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Developer Against Dissenting Society Members. The Court held that balance of convenience favored appointment of Receiver to preserve subject matter pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Sep 2013The petitioner, Shree Krishna Homes Pvt. Ltd., a developer, entered into a development agreement dated 14th December 2011 with respondent No.1, a coop...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restriction on Multi-Storied Parking Lots Under DCR 33(24). State Government's Power to Modify Development Control Regulations Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 Upheld — No Vested Right in Unamended Regulation.
19 Nov 2012The petitioners, claiming ownership of a plot in Tardeo, Mumbai, challenged a decision of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai contained in a l...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.
4 Jul 2012The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Under Section 13(1)(hhh) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The court held that the landlord's requirement for reconstruction was not bona fide as no sanctioned plan or financial capacity was shown, and the tenant's hardship outweighed the landlord's need.
4 Aug 2005The petitioner, Pandit Arjun Nagoji, was a tenant of an open plot of land admeasuring 12' x 20' situated at 48, Bombay Pune Road, Bopodi, Pune, at a m...
- 73
