Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Capital Gains Case — Section 54F Deduction Computation Clarified. Investment in new asset before due date of filing return qualifies for exemption even if return is filed late.

The appellant, Humayun Suleman Merchant, sold a plot of land in Mumbai on 29th April 1995 for Rs.85,33,250/-, resulting in a long-term capital gain. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

The appellant, Bajirao Ramchandra Shelar, filed two second appeals (Second Appeal No.494 of 1990 and Second Appeal No.495 of 1990) against the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition for Minor Irrigation Tank — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Acre with 30% Solatium and 12% Additional Market Value. Comparable Sales Method Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Fix Enhanced Compensation.

The appellants, whose land was acquired for construction of a minor irrigation tank, challenged the judgment and award of the Reference Court dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Order Against Cooperative Society and Remands for Fresh Consideration. Registrar's Suo Motu Power Upheld but Exercise Lacked Application of Mind and Proportionality.

The petitioner, Janhit Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, a Cooperative Credit Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GULFISHA FATIMA

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...