Search Results for "Rule 273"

644 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 644 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Minority Institutions' Appeal in Teacher Selection Dispute — Amendment to Regulation 17 Not Applicable to Pending Selections. Selection Process Concludes Upon Forwarding of Proposal to DIOS for Approval Under Section 16-FF(3) of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.

The case involves two minority institutions in Uttar Pradesh that initiated the process of selecting teachers under the U.P. Intermediate Education Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Bail and Quashes Police Custody Remand Orders in Prison Corruption Case. Petitioner's Husband, a Police Constable, Granted Bail on Conditions as Investigation Complete and No Further Custodial Interrogation Required.

The petitioner, Sadhana Rathod, wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...