Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Bail and Quashes Police Custody Remand Orders in Prison Corruption Case. Petitioner's Husband, a Police Constable, Granted Bail on Conditions as Investigation Complete and No Further Custodial Interrogation Required.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sadhana Rathod, wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the orders dated 1st December 2022, 5th December 2022, and 8th December 2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur. The orders granted police custody remand to her husband and rejected her application under Section 97 CrPC for his recovery. The accused, a police constable attached to Central Prison, Nagpur, was arrested in Crime No.332/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894, for allegedly supplying ganja and transmitting messages to jail inmates using a bogus sim card. The petitioner sought quashing of the remand orders and grant of bail. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the police custody remand orders were not sustainable as the investigation was complete and no further custodial interrogation was necessary. The court also upheld the rejection of the Section 97 CrPC application as the accused was in lawful custody. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the remand orders, and granted bail to the accused on conditions including a personal bond of Rs.25,000 and one surety, with directions to cooperate with the investigation and not tamper with evidence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Police Custody Remand - Sections 482, 97, 167 CrPC, Article 227 Constitution - The petitioner, wife of arrested accused, challenged orders granting police custody remand and rejecting her application under Section 97 CrPC for recovery of the accused. The court held that the police custody remand orders were passed without proper application of mind and the accused was entitled to bail as the investigation was complete and no further custodial interrogation was required. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Procedure - Section 97 CrPC - Application for Recovery of Person - The petitioner's application under Section 97 CrPC for recovery of her husband was rejected by the Magistrate. The court held that the rejection was proper as the accused was in lawful custody and Section 97 applies only to wrongful confinement. (Paras 2-8)

C) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Conditions - The court granted bail to the accused on conditions including furnishing a personal bond and surety, and directed him to cooperate with the investigation and not tamper with evidence. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the orders granting police custody remand and rejecting the application under Section 97 CrPC were legally sustainable, and whether the petitioner's husband was entitled to bail.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the orders dated 1st December 2022, 5th December 2022, and 8th December 2022, and granted bail to the accused Ajinkya Subhash Rathod on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and not tampering with evidence.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Police custody remand
  • Section 97 CrPC
  • Article 227
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Right to fair investigation
  • Custodial interrogation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 320

Criminal Writ Petition No. 858 of 2022

2023-02-06

G. A. Sanap, J.

Mr. N.B. Rathod for Petitioner, Mr. A.R. Chutke APP for Respondent/State

Sadhana w/o Ajinkya Rathod

State of Maharashtra through PSO Dhantoli Police Station

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging orders granting police custody remand and rejecting application under Section 97 CrPC, and seeking bail.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (wife of arrested accused) sought quashing of remand orders dated 1st December 2022, 5th December 2022, and 8th December 2022, and grant of bail to her husband.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the legality of police custody remand orders and rejection of her application under Section 97 CrPC for recovery of her husband.

Previous Decisions

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur Court No.1 passed orders on 1st December 2022 and 5th December 2022 granting police custody remand, and on 8th December 2022 remanding to magisterial custody; also rejected application under Section 97 CrPC on 5th December 2022.

Issues

Whether the orders granting police custody remand were legally sustainable. Whether the rejection of the application under Section 97 CrPC was proper. Whether the petitioner's husband was entitled to bail.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the police custody remand orders were passed without proper application of mind and that the investigation was complete, hence no further custodial interrogation was required. Respondent/State opposed the petition, arguing that the remand was necessary for investigation and that the accused was involved in serious offences.

Ratio Decidendi

Police custody remand cannot be granted mechanically; it must be based on necessity for investigation. When investigation is complete and no further custodial interrogation is required, the accused is entitled to bail. Section 97 CrPC applies only to wrongful confinement, not lawful custody.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, who is the wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Subhash Rathod, has questioned the correctness of the orders dated 1st December, 2022 and 5th December, 2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur Court No.1 granting police custody remand to the husband of the petitioner. The court held that the police custody remand orders were not sustainable and the accused was entitled to bail.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 858 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur Court No.1 dated 1st December 2022, 5th December 2022, and 8th December 2022. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 6th February 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 97, 167, 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B
  • Prisons Act, 1894: 42, 45
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Registrar in Co-operative Societies Act Arbitration Dispute, Setting Aside High Court Order Appointing Substitute Arbitrator. High Court Erred in Holding Registrar Functus Officio and Invoking Arbitration Act Section 46; Act Pro...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife's Death Case - Overturns High Court Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Application of Section 106 Evidence Act - Trial Court's Acquittal Restored