Search Results for "Original Application"

16796 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16796 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection and Permission to Sue Under Section 91 CPC — Public Nuisance and Suit by Private Persons for Public Property Upheld

The petitioner, Omkar Pandit Bankar, filed a civil revision application challenging two orders passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jamner in R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals as Fraudulent Due to Fabricated Vakalatnama and Forgery of Appellant's Signature. Court Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Advocates and Notary for Misusing Legal Process to File SLP Without Appellant's Consent.

The Supreme Court dealt with two appeals purportedly filed by Bhagwan Singh challenging a High Court order quashing criminal proceedings and a subsequ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Variation of Consent Order in Copyright Dispute Over Music Videos. Denial of opportunity to file reply before modifying consent order violates principles of natural justice.

The Appellant, Aman Chhabra, filed a commercial suit against the Respondents concerning the copyright of two music videos, 'Pyar To Na Kaho' and 'Lutt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC without considering the plaintiffs' claim of possession and the pending amendment application.

The appellants, plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 220/1993/A, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in 1993, claiming ownership and possessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...