Search Results for "Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act"

939 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 939 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers in Cooperative Society Election. Minor Defect of Non-Signing of Affidavit-B Held Curable Under Rule 21(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 2014.

The petitioners, Baghele Narottam Gendlal and Thakre Mangal Chudaman, filed writ petitions challenging the rejection of their nomination papers for el...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers in Cooperative Society Election. Failure to Sign Affidavit-B Held to be a Minor Defect Curable Under Rule 21(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 2014.

The petitioners, Baghele Narottam Gendlal and Thakre Mangal Chudaman, filed writ petitions challenging the rejection of their nomination papers for el...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Auction Sale in Co-operative Bank Recovery for Non-Compliance with Rule 107 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961. Sale Set Aside Due to Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure and Lack of Proper Notice to Borrower.

The petitioner, M/s. Puran Automobiles, a partnership firm, had taken a loan from the respondent Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd. The Bank obtained a certific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners Challenging Enquiry Under Section 88 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Against Contractors and Suppliers. Enquiry Under Section 88 Cannot Be Conducted Against Persons Who Are Not Members, Past Members, or Office Bearers of the Cooperative Society.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Tejas Constructions (a partnership firm) and ATV Projects India Ltd. (a company) challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute. Court upholds award based on settlement agreement and finds no grounds for interference under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Suratsingh Chaudhary, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitration award...