Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Dissolution of Board of Directors of Cooperative Society for Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner before passing the impugned order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vinayak Ukharam Chavhan, was elected as Chairman of Respondent No. 4 Society, a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. He challenged an order dated 08.04.2022 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Aurangabad, in Revision Application No. 5 of 2022. By that order, the Divisional Joint Registrar dissolved the Board of Directors of the society and appointed an Authorized Officer from the office of Additional Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Kannad, under Section 77A(b)(1) of the Act. The revision application had been filed by Respondent Nos. 5 to 14, who were members of the society, against an order of the Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Kannad, who had refused to appoint an Authorized Officer. The petitioner contended that the impugned order was passed without issuing any notice or giving him an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The Court examined the record and found that no notice was issued to the petitioner before passing the order. The Court held that the order was passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and could not be sustained. Consequently, the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order and restored the Board of Directors of the society. The Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the revision application and left it open for the Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the same afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Dissolution of Board of Directors - Section 77A Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 - Natural Justice - The Divisional Joint Registrar passed an order dissolving the Board of Directors and appointing an Authorized Officer without issuing any notice or giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, who was the Chairman of the Society. The Court held that the order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and set it aside, restoring the Board of Directors. (Paras 1-5)

B) Cooperative Law - Revision - Section 154 Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 - Maintainability - The Court noted that the revision application was filed by certain members of the society against the order of the Assistant Registrar refusing to appoint an Authorized Officer. The Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the revision and passed the impugned order. The Court did not delve into the merits of the revision but focused on the violation of natural justice. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dissolving the Board of Directors and appointing an Authorized Officer under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960, passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 08.04.2022 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Aurangabad, in Revision Application No. 5 of 2022, and restored the Board of Directors of the society. The Court left it open for the Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the revision application afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Section 77A Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Revision under Section 154
  • Dissolution of Board of Directors
  • Appointment of Authorized Officer
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 8

Writ Petition No. 521 of 2023

2023-08-03

Kishore C. Sant

2023:BHC-AUG:16454

Mr. Kamalakar J. Suryawanshi (for petitioner), Ms. D.S. Jape (AGP for State), Mr. L.H. Kawale (for Respondent Nos. 5 to 10), Mr. R.V. Gore (for Respondent Nos. 11 to 14)

Vinayak Ukharam Chavhan

Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Aurangabad & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging an order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dissolving the Board of Directors of a cooperative society and appointing an Authorized Officer.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 08.04.2022 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Aurangabad, in Revision Application No. 5 of 2022.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, Chairman of the society, was not given any notice or opportunity of hearing before the impugned order was passed, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Kannad, had earlier refused to appoint an Authorized Officer. That order was challenged by some members in Revision Application No. 5 of 2022, which was allowed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, resulting in the impugned order.

Issues

Whether the impugned order dissolving the Board of Directors and appointing an Authorized Officer under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960, was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that no notice was issued to him before passing the impugned order, and he was not given any opportunity of hearing, thus violating natural justice. The respondents did not dispute the lack of notice but argued on merits.

Ratio Decidendi

An order dissolving the Board of Directors of a cooperative society under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960, cannot be passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the affected parties, as it violates the principles of natural justice. The order is liable to be set aside on this ground alone.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is elected as Chairman to the Respondent No. 4 Society. He has challenged the order dated 08.04.2022 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Aurangabad in Revision Application No. 5 of 2022, thereby, dissolving the Board of Directors and appointing an authorized Officer... The record reveals that no notice was issued to the petitioner before passing the impugned order. The impugned order is passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. Hence, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Kannad, refused to appoint an Authorized Officer. Some members filed Revision Application No. 5 of 2022 before the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Aurangabad, who allowed the revision and passed the impugned order on 08.04.2022. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition on 28.06.2023 (reserved) and judgment was pronounced on 03.08.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 77A, Section 154
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Dissolution of Board of Directors of Cooperative Society for Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside as no opportunity of hearing wa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Death of 17-Year-Old Student. Notional Income of Deceased Student Fixed at Rs.3,000 Per Month Instead of Rs.10,000, Applying Multiplier of 18 and...