Search Results for "certificate does not confer title"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "certificate does not confer title"

479 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Certificate Under Section 24 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is Evidence of Transfer, Not Certificate of Title. The court held that a certificate under Section 24 is merely evidence of transfer and does not confer title, thus the suit for possession without challenging the consolidation order was maintainable.

19 Sep 2019

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a civil suit for possession of agricultural land. The appellant (original ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Patent and Trademark Infringement Case — Finds No Prima Facie Case for Injunction. Court holds that patent for method and apparatus does not extend to product, and trademark registration is subject to opposition, thus no interim injunction warranted.

29 Mar 2010

The appeal arises from an order dated 19.11.2009 in Notice of Motion No.3709 of 2009 in Suit No.2576 of 2009, whereby the trial court granted an inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Directing Registration of BIFR Orders Under Registration Act, 1908 for Property Transfer by Operation of Law. BIFR orders sanctioning a scheme of revival-cum-demerger under SICA Act are documents affecting immovable property and require registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908; refusal to register on ground of non-exemption is not justified.

6 May 2026

The Petitioner, Swayam Realtors & Traders LLP, originally a company under the Companies Act, 1956 and later converted into an LLP under the Limited Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Holds Suit Not Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Plaintiffs, Claiming Independent Rights as Co-owners and Not Being Parties to Loan/Mortgage Transaction, Could Not Be Barred Under Section 34 as Their Suit Challenges Mortgage Validity Only Against Their Share, Not the Securitization Process Itself.

8 Dec 2010

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between State Bank of India (appellant/first defendant) and Crosslink Shipbreakers (P) Ltd. (principal borro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Derequisition of Premises Under Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 — Petitioner Failed to Establish Bona Fide Need for Own Use and Acquiesced to Requisition for Over Two Decades.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioners, All India Cotton Seeds Crushers' Association and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to derequisition Flat Nos. 2 and 3...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Rules, 2022 as Ultra Vires the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. Substitution of 'Assistant Commissioner (Sub-Divisional Magistrate)' for 'Magistrate of the First Class or Presidency Magistrate' in Rule 9(3) was held to be beyond the rule-making power under Section 30 of the Act, as it conflicted with the specific mandate of Section 13(3) requiring a judicial order for delayed registrations beyond one year.

17 Apr 2023

The writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the validity of the Karnataka Registration of Births and De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Maintainability Challenge Rejected. Division Bench Holds That Writ Petition Under Article 226 Is Maintainable Despite Availability of Revision, and That a Division Bench Has Jurisdiction to Hear Such Petitions.

23 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mr. Nusli Neville Wadia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Derequisition of Premises Under Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement as Requisition Was for Public Purpose and No Unauthorized Use Proven.

22 Feb 2019

The Petitioners, All India Cotton Seeds Crushers' Association and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bomb...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeals by Commercial Space Buyers in CIRP of IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. — Resolution Plan Must Include Allottees' Claims. The Tribunal held that commercial space allottees are 'financial creditors' under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and their claims must be considered in the resolution plan.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from three appeals filed by commercial space allottees against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Principal Bench...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Petroleum Pipeline — Public Interest in Infrastructure Project Outweighs Individual Hardship. Acquisition of land for laying a petroleum pipeline by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. is a public purpose under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and urgency clause under Section 17 was validly invoked.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioners, Dharampal Sharma, Vikram Auto Services, Abha Dharampal Sharma, and Dr. Vikram Dharampal Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 2...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)