NCLAT Allows Appeals by Commercial Space Buyers in CIRP of IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. — Resolution Plan Must Include Allottees' Claims. The Tribunal held that commercial space allottees are 'financial creditors' under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and their claims must be considered in the resolution plan.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI In Favour of Accused
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment arises from three appeals filed by commercial space allottees against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Praveen Arya and others, and Nupur Garg, were allotted commercial spaces in a project developed by the corporate debtor. They challenged the NCLT's orders dated 30.10.2023 and 05.10.2023, which dismissed their applications seeking inclusion of their claims in the resolution plan. The core legal issue was whether commercial space allottees qualify as 'financial creditors' under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellants argued that they had invested money for the purpose of receiving commercial space, which constitutes a financial debt. The respondents, including the Resolution Professional (RP) and the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), contended that commercial space allottees are not financial creditors and that their claims were not required to be included. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) analyzed the definition of 'financial debt' under Section 5(8)(f), which includes any amount raised under a transaction for the time value of money. The Tribunal noted that the allottees had paid consideration for the allotment of commercial space, and the corporate debtor was obligated to deliver the space, which involves a time value of money. Relying on precedents, the NCLAT held that commercial space allottees are financial creditors. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the RP and SRA to include the claims of the allottees in the resolution plan. The judgment emphasizes that the IBC aims to protect the interests of all creditors, including allottees of commercial spaces.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Financial Creditor - Commercial Space Allottee - Section 5(8)(f) IBC, 2016 - The issue was whether commercial space allottees are financial creditors under Section 5(8)(f) of the IBC. The Tribunal held that commercial space allottees are financial creditors as they have invested money for the purpose of receiving commercial space, which amounts to a financial debt. The resolution plan must include their claims. (Paras 1-10)

B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Resolution Plan - Inclusion of Claims - Section 30, 31 IBC, 2016 - The Tribunal held that the resolution plan must consider the claims of allottees of commercial spaces, as they are financial creditors. The Adjudicating Authority's order excluding such claims was set aside. (Paras 11-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether commercial space allottees are financial creditors under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and whether their claims must be included in the resolution plan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. Impugned orders set aside. Resolution Professional and Successful Resolution Applicant directed to include claims of the allottees in the resolution plan.

Law Points

  • Commercial space allottees are financial creditors under Section 5(8)(f) of IBC
  • 2016
  • Resolution plan must include claims of allottees
  • CIRP cannot exclude claims of commercial space buyers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 106

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 40 of 2024, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 45 of 2024, Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 61 of 2024

0000-00-00

Ashok Bhushan

For Appellants: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Ms. Nidhi Yadav, Advocates; Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Aishwarya Modi Seth, Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Pushpendra S. Bhadoriya, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalra, Advocates for RP; Mr. P. Nagesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocate for SRA.

Praveen Arya & Ors. and Nupur Garg

Anju Aggarwal (RP of Corporate Debtor) & Anr. and M/s IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (Through Resolution Professional) & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against orders of NCLT in CIRP of corporate debtor, seeking inclusion of claims of commercial space allottees in resolution plan.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of NCLT orders and direction to include their claims in the resolution plan.

Filing Reason

NCLT dismissed applications of commercial space allottees seeking inclusion of their claims in the resolution plan.

Previous Decisions

NCLT orders dated 30.10.2023 and 05.10.2023 dismissed the applications.

Issues

Whether commercial space allottees are financial creditors under Section 5(8)(f) of IBC. Whether the resolution plan must include claims of commercial space allottees.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that they are financial creditors as they invested money for commercial space, which is a financial debt. Respondents argued that commercial space allottees are not financial creditors and their claims need not be included.

Ratio Decidendi

Commercial space allottees are financial creditors under Section 5(8)(f) of the IBC, as their investment for allotment of commercial space constitutes a financial debt. The resolution plan must include their claims.

Judgment Excerpts

These three Appeal(s) arise of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) of the same Corporate Debtor – M/s IP Construction Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant(s) in these Appeal(s) are commercial space buyer, who were allotted commercial spaces.

Procedural History

The NCLT passed orders on 30.10.2023 and 05.10.2023 dismissing applications of commercial space allottees. Appeals were filed before NCLAT against these orders.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 5(8)(f), 30, 31
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Allows Appeals by Commercial Space Buyers in CIRP of IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. — Resolution Plan Must Include Allottees' Claims. The Tribunal held that commercial space allottees are 'financial creditors' under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolve...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Allotment to Educational Society — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Legal Right Established Over Final Plot No.80