Search Results for "Section 148 Income Tax Act"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Notice Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Limitation Period Expired for Original Assessment Order. Reassessment Order Does Not Extend Limitation for Revising Original Assessment Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 April 2009 issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nashik under Section 263 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment After Four Years Invalid as Assessee Had Made Full Disclosure During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged a notice dated 28 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-lifting of Liquor by CL-9 Licensees. Court Decides in Light of Earlier Decision in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, Allowing Petitioners to Raise Further Grounds.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various CL-9 license holders, including bars and restaurants, challenging the imposition o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Full and True Disclosure. Deduction Under Section 80M Allowed Based on Dividend Distributed Before Due Date.

The petitioner, Godrej Agrovet Limited, a domestic company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2003-04 on 27th November, 2003 declaring an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Based on Same Facts Already Considered During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) — Held That Change of Opinion Does Not Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 11 January 2011 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148A(d) of Income Tax Act for Mechanical Disposal Without Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Assessee's Detailed Response Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Rendering Subsequent Section 148 Notice Invalid.

The petitioner, Laxmi Infra Developers Limited, challenged a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 24.03.2022, proposing rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Original Assessment Was Based on Full Disclosure and Scrutiny.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, is engaged in the business of providing audiovisual television content, films, events, and related ...