Search Results for "Orissa"

2113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Cut-Off Marks in Screening Test for Junior Scale Officer Recruitment. Rule 10 of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 Requires Objective Criteria; Commission's Discretion Must Be Exercised Reasonably.

The petitioners, who applied for the post of Junior Scale Officer in the Goa Civil Services, challenged the action of the Goa Public Service Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment and Recasting of Issues in Property Suit — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Amend Plaint and Add Relief of Possession Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Trial Court's Rejection of Amendment and Recasting of Issue Set Aside as Premature and Contrary to Law.

The petitioner, Archana Ashok Amburle, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.6 of 2012 before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Dapoli, seeking a mandatory in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty and Desertion Case. Filing of False Criminal Case Under Section 498-A IPC and Section 97 CrPC Constitutes Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife filed a second appeal against the judgment and order of the District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Regular ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Loan Repayment Claim Upheld Despite Lack of Written Agreement. Preponderance of Probabilities Favored Plaintiff as Defendant Admitted Receipt of Money but Failed to Prove Alternative Purpose.

The appellant, Mr. Manjunath S., filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...