downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
Search Results for "trade union possession"
583 result(s) found
Found 583 result(s)
Supreme Court
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012
6 Feb 2026The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...
- 334
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Appointment of Technical Assistants in Public Works Department — Selection Process Found Vitiated by Arbitrariness and Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules. The court quashed the appointments and directed a fresh selection process, holding that the recruitment must strictly follow the prescribed Recruitment Rules and principles of natural justice.
11 Sep 2025The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by individuals challenging the appointment of Technical Assistants (CEIT) in the Public Works...
- 43
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case but Reduces Sentence — Recovery of 13 Kg Charas from Dhaba Counter. Conscious possession established as appellant was managing the dhaba and contraband found below counter; sentence reduced from 15 to 10 years considering age and first offence.
15 Sep 2020The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Jeet Ram against his conviction under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985...
- 193
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings — Impugned Order Quashed. Court Held That Executing Court Must Consider Objections of Third Party Obstructor on Merits Under Order XXI Rules 97, 98, and 101 CPC.
27 Sep 2024The petitioner, Rajesh Enterprises, a partnership firm represented by its partner Naresh Godar Shah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...
- 263
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.
1 Dec 2016The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.
17 Feb 2022The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...
- 1800
High Court
High Court of Karnataka addressed writ petitions filed by a physically disabled doctor and her mother seeking refund and compensation from Air India and a travel agent for alleged deficiency in service during a customized tour. The court heard arguments on maintainability under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and the applicability of the Montreal Convention to limit liability for delayed baggage, but the provided judgment text ends before any final decision.
25 Sep 2019The High Court of Karnataka heard two writ petitions filed by a doctor with 75% permanent physical impairment and her elderly mother, seeking refund a...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.
10 May 2013The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Despite Objections to Earlier Appointee. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution and Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Empowers Court to Appoint Arbitrator When Parties Fail to Agree.
20 Dec 2013The applicants, partners of a dissolved partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeki...
- 52
