Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2027 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2027 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award for Failure to Prove Ownership. Petitioner's claim of title based on a 1962 sale deed was unsupported by documentary evidence, leading to dismissal of writ petition.

The petitioner, Sayed Mohamed Shah Abdul Hamid Kadri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Prove Lapse Under Section 24(2) of LARR Act, 2013. Compensation Tendered and Possession Taken by MIDC, Acquisition Did Not Lapse.

The petitioners, Ramesh Bapurao Nikhade and Dilipkumar Bapurao Nikhade, along with the legal representatives of Bapurao Dasruji Nikhade, filed writ pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears First Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Land Acquisition Compensation Award. Court Reviews Reference Court's Enhancement to Rs. 15 per sq. meter and Parties' Contentions on Valuation and Notice.

The appeal and cross-objections arose from a reference court award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State acquired 18,430 sq. meters of land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as He Was Not the Owner of the Acquired Land.

The petitioner, Manoj Mohanlal Bilala, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by th...