Search Results for "reserved area"

4675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Burial of Christian Father in Native Village Graveyard — Right to Dignified Burial Upheld Under Article 21. State Directed to Provide Police Protection Despite Opposition from Villagers.

The appellant, Ramesh Baghel, a third-generation Christian belonging to the Mahra community, sought to bury his deceased father in the village graveya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee, a society of villagers, challenging permissions granted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Development Plan Reservation — Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Landowners Entitled to Develop Lands as Acquisition Not Completed Within Ten Years.

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Survey Nos. 103 and 104 at Kopargaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Pune. Acquisition under Section 126 of MRTP Act for public purpose is valid and petitioner cannot claim title over land reserved for road.

The petitioner, Atur Park-4 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of its land for road widening in P...