Search Results for "order set aside"

31386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Co-operative Society for Lack of Notice Under Section 164 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds That Civil Suit Is Barred by Sections 91 and 163 of the Act as Disputes Relate to Society's Internal Management.

The plaintiffs, B.Y. Chavan and another, filed a suit against the Association of Tenants of the Bombay Catholic Housing Society and others, seeking re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application Challenging Restoration of Suit in Property Dispute — Plaint Not Barred by Res Judicata or Specific Relief Act. New Cause of Action Arising from Assignment of Lease Justifies Fresh Declaratory Suit Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a long-standing property dispute over a plot of land in Naigaon, Dadar, Mumbai. The original lessee, Goswami Maharaj, granted a 999-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Fair Price Shop Authorization Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's authorization cancelled without notice or opportunity of hearing, and appellate order also set aside for lack of proper consideration.

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath, was a fair price shop dealer authorized under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. His authorization was cancelled by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court Order Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Conditional Order Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC. Failure to Pay Costs and File Written Statement Within Extended Time Leads to Automatic Striking Out of Defence.

The petitioners, Mr. Venugopal Krishnamurthy and Mrs. Poorna Venugopal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...