High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Appeals Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Court Considers Multiple Claims for Compensation Arising from Accidents.
22 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "mutual legal assistance"
458 result(s) found
Found 458 result(s)
High Court
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Disposes of Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals under Section 173(1) of MV Act. The appeals arose from awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal concerning compensation for injuries and deaths in road accidents.
22 Dec 2020The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench heard a batch of miscellaneous first appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...
- 64
High Court
- 43
High Court
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Notice of Motion for Rejection of Plaint in Trust Suit Under Order VII Rule 10A CPC. The Court Examines Whether Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 10A CPC and Limitation Bar the Freshly Filed Suit.
22 Aug 2013The matter arose from a Notice of Motion taken out by defendant no.7 in a trust dispute suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The plaintiff claim...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Renewal Applications. Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prevents Removal of Marks from Register.
16 Feb 2024The petitioner, Motwane Private Ltd., had registered three trade marks under the mark 'MOTWANE' bearing registration numbers 312470, 312472, and 31247...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Applications. Court holds that failure to issue notice under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 before removal of marks from register renders removal invalid, and marks must be treated as continuing on register.
16 Feb 2024The petitioner, Motwane Private Ltd., had registered three trade marks under Nos. 312470, 312472, and 312473, which were renewed up to 17 February 198...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Loan vs. Capital Contribution and Rejection of Counterclaim as Not Maintainable. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 failed.
23 Jan 2020The petitioner, Shekhar Appu Shetty, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dat...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Petition Challenging Husband's Right to Enter Matrimonial Home Under Domestic Violence Act. Shared Residence Ordered for Both Spouses in Large Matrimonial Home Comprising Multiple Flats.
21 Oct 2010The petitioner-wife challenged a part of the order of the learned Judge, 2nd Family Court, Mumbai, dated 15th June 2010, which did not restrain the re...
- 80
