Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Disposes Multiple Insurance Appeals and Claimant Enhancement Petitions in Motor Accident Cases — Awards of Tribunals Challenged under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court heard a batch of appeals arising from awards of various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, involving issues of liability, quantum of compensation, and interest.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI
Admin
2026-09-17 08:37:56
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC030047792012_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (12) 10

MFA NO.31781/2010

2020-12-22

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Shivanand Patil, Harshavardhan R. Malipatil

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Shamaraya S/o Basanna Kattimani, Gousuddin S/o Ameerudin, The President Gurudev Education Society, Dinesh M. Naik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Remedy Sought

Appellants seek setting aside or modification of compensation awards; some seek enhancement

Filing Reason

Dissatisfied with quantum of compensation or liability determination

Previous Decisions

Various Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards

Procedural History

Claim petitions filed before various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals; awards passed; appeals filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act before High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Motor Accident Claims Insurance Appeal Compensation Enhancement Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act Multi-appeal batch Karnataka High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes District Collector's Order Reducing Liquor Shop Timings in Parbhani — Arbitrary Exercise of Power Violates Article 19(1)(g). The court held that the Collector lacked authority to alter business hours fixed under the Bombay... 2026-09-19 04:51:26
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case; Arrear Dividends on Shares Held Not Taxable as Income. Purchase of Shares Cum-Dividend Implied Price Included Dividend Amount, Which Was Not Income of the Purchaser but Capital Receipt Under ... 2026-09-19 04:51:26
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act, 19...

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Appeal — Sets Aside NCL...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Lost Your Password?