Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Disposes Multiple Insurance Appeals and Claimant Enhancement Petitions in Motor Accident Cases — Awards of Tribunals Challenged under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court heard a batch of appeals arising from awards of various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, involving issues of liability, quantum of compensation, and interest.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI
Admin
2026-11-03 02:32:27
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC030047792012_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (12) 10

MFA NO.31781/2010

2020-12-22

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Shivanand Patil, Harshavardhan R. Malipatil

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Shamaraya S/o Basanna Kattimani, Gousuddin S/o Ameerudin, The President Gurudev Education Society, Dinesh M. Naik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Remedy Sought

Appellants seek setting aside or modification of compensation awards; some seek enhancement

Filing Reason

Dissatisfied with quantum of compensation or liability determination

Previous Decisions

Various Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards

Procedural History

Claim petitions filed before various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals; awards passed; appeals filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act before High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Motor Accident Claims Insurance Appeal Compensation Enhancement Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act Multi-appeal batch Karnataka High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Writ Petitioners and Respondent in Blacklisting Challenge Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950. State's Resolution Not to Deal with Petitioners and Blacklisting of Approved Contractor Were Set Aside for Failure to Giv... 2026-11-03 14:16:49
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Claim of Ownership in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Validated. Sale deed executed on 29.6.1978 was found to be a genuine transaction transferring ownership rights. 2026-11-03 14:16:49
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Police Officer in Preventive Detention Case...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process...

Supreme Court Allows Recruitment Appeal in Police Constable Case Due to Flawed Medical Ass...

Lost Your Password?