High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.
17 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "khata"
378 result(s) found
Found 378 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Cancellation of Freedom Fighter Land Grant; Upholds State's Inherent Power to Investigate Fraud. Fraud Vitiates Everything and No Estoppel Arises Against the State; Show Cause Notice and Reference to Lokayukta Under Section 7(2-A) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Are Not Interfered With.
13 Oct 2017The High Court of Karnataka adjudicated a writ petition filed by Sri S. Sundaresh, son of a deceased freedom fighter, challenging a show cause notice ...
- 26
High Court
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiffs' Writ Petitions in Partition Suit — Court Commissioner Directed to Compare Disputed Signature with Sub-Registrar's Register. Trial Court's Rejection of Application to Compare Signature with Registered GPA Register Set Aside Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC.
1 Apr 2014The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a partition suit (O.S. No. 225/06) pending before the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Chikmagalur, filed writ petitions ...
- 40
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered
11 Oct 2013The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...
- 25
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Finds Trial Court Erred in Decreeing Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.
29 Aug 2013The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 16.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Doddaballapur, in OS No.275/2002 (old No.76/2001), d...
- 55
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Declaration and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff's Title Not Established and Defendant's Adverse Possession Upheld.
17 Jul 2013The case involves a property dispute where the plaintiff, Smt. Anusuyamma, claimed absolute ownership of a residential site in Mathikere, Bangalore, p...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Directs State Not to Initiate ULC Proceedings Against Petitioner in Respect of Land Already Declared Surplus in Brother's Name. The Court held that once proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 were concluded against the brother, the same land cannot be subjected to fresh proceedings against the petitioner.
5 Jun 2013The petitioner, Ningaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents not to ...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Suit Maintainability in Land Declaration Dispute After Finding Notice Under Section 80 CPC by Karta Sufficient for Divided Coparceners. Karta’s Notice Given While Family Joint Held to Enure for Benefit of All Coparceners Despite Subsequent Partition, as Substantial Identity Existed Between Notice-Giver and Plaintiffs under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
11 Mar 1969The dispute arose from a declaratory suit filed by Beohar Rajendra Sinha and his three grandsons against the State of Madhya Pradesh seeking a declara...
- 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Redemption-Decree Holder in Mortgage Suit Under U.P. Agriculturists’ Relief Act Despite Repeal. Repeal of Relief Act Did Not Affect Pending Proceedings Due to Savings Clause in Section 6 of U.P. General Clauses Act and Section 23 of Amending Act 18 of 1956.
10 Dec 1965The dispute arose from a mortgage transaction where the successor-in-interest of the original mortgagor, the respondent, filed an application under Se...
- 38
