Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-07-27 10:56:11
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.3255 OF 2023

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 156

Writ Petition No. 3255 of 2023

2025-04-17

A.S. Gadkari, Kamal Khata

2025:BHC-OS:6661-DB

Mr. Mahesh Rajpopat, a/w Mr. Akshit Kothari and Mr. Meet Rajpopat for the Petitioner. Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, a/w Ms. Meena Dhuri and Ms. Priyanka Sonawane, i/by Ms. Komal Punjabi for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Dilip Shinde, a/w Mr. Vilas Sawant for Respondent No.3. Mr. Jagdish N. Jayale for Plaintiff in L.C. Suit No.429/2025 of City Civil Court.

Asif Fazal Khan

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Municipal Officer K/East Ward, Azam Akbar Khan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (B.M.C. Act, 1888):
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ petition municipal corporation Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Greater Mumbai

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888. 2026-07-27 10:56:11
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Partition Suit — Upholds High Court Order Permitting Challenge to Will and Inclusion of Movable Properties. Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Cross-Examination Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI... 2026-07-27 10:56:10
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt limitation Circumstantial Evidence Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?