High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 156
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.3255 OF 2023

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 156

Writ Petition No. 3255 of 2023

2025-04-17

A.S. Gadkari, Kamal Khata

2025:BHC-OS:6661-DB

Mr. Mahesh Rajpopat, a/w Mr. Akshit Kothari and Mr. Meet Rajpopat for the Petitioner. Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, a/w Ms. Meena Dhuri and Ms. Priyanka Sonawane, i/by Ms. Komal Punjabi for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Dilip Shinde, a/w Mr. Vilas Sawant for Respondent No.3. Mr. Jagdish N. Jayale for Plaintiff in L.C. Suit No.429/2025 of City Civil Court.

Asif Fazal Khan

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Municipal Officer K/East Ward, Azam Akbar Khan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (B.M.C. Act, 1888):
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State's Claim on Employee's Date of Birth — Confirms 1.9.1930 as Correct Date.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Income Tax Notices in Reassessment Proceedings Due to Procedural Irregularities. Issuance of Notices Without Addressing Objections Violates Legal Principles Under Income Tax Act, 1961.