Search Results for "block period"

2996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010044762015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.

The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Recall of Tender for Mine Operator Under Section 14 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999. Court Examines Whether Lowest Bidder Has Vested Right and Whether Conviction of Ex-Directors Justifies Cancellation.

The Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (the Corporation) issued a notice inviting tender on 02.12.2020 for the selection of a Mine Operator for the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch and Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders Set Aside as Show-Cause Notice Did Not Specify Charges and Inquiry Was Conducted Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioners, who were members of the Gram Panchayat Karodi Sajapur including the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch, challenged the orders dated 6th Februar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Market Committee in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the Special Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee for Fruits and Vegetables (the appellant) agai...