WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022
2 May 2025The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
Search Results for "Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation"
2110 result(s) found
Found 2110 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension Orders of Municipal Officers Under Section 56(1)(b) of BPMC Act for Disciplinary Enquiry. The court overruled a previous Division Bench decision that had restricted the provision to criminal proceedings, holding that suspension pending enquiry into charges is valid.
22 Dec 2011The case involved a writ petition filed by five officers of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation challenging their suspension orders. The petitioners...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Pune. Acquisition under Section 126 of MRTP Act for public purpose is valid and petitioner cannot claim title over land reserved for road.
19 Apr 2023The petitioner, Atur Park-4 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of its land for road widening in P...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO's Land Allotment to Private Developer in Navi Mumbai Under MRTP Act. Alleged Violations Include Absence of Open Tender, Lack of Government Approval for FSI Enhancement, and Unauthorized Land Use Conversion in Sector 30A Vashi, Under Sections 113, 154 and New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations, 1975.
21 Nov 2014The case pertains to two public interest litigations filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.
17 Mar 2025The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...
- 715
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Rampant Illegal Hoardings by Political and Religious Entities Across Maharashtra. Court Interprets Definition of Skysign and Requirement of Written Permission Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
31 Jan 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized with a group of Public Interest Litigations and Writ Petitions raising serious concerns regarding th...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.
17 Oct 2012The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Panchayat Election Schedule During COVID-19 Pandemic — State Election Commission's Power to Conduct Elections Under Article 243K and Goa Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Upheld. The court held that the election schedule was not arbitrary and that the Commission had taken adequate safety measures, dismissing petitions challenging the schedule.
11 Dec 2020The petitioners, who were candidates or intending candidates for the Goa Panchayat elections, challenged the election schedule notified by the Goa Sta...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioner's Land Reservation Lapses Automatically Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 as Respondents Did Not Issue Declaration Under Section 126.
9 Dec 2022The petitioner, Purshotam Vishandas Raheja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking ...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.
18 Mar 2019The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...
- 44
