Search Results for "Extended limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Extended limitation"

1857 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1857 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Over Excess Payments and Blacklisting — Limitation Period Not Barred as Dispute Continued and Final Bill Not Rejected.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves a dispute between Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board) and Saryu Plastics Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) regarding supply co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Time Extension Dispute — Holds Application Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After Expiry of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate. The court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to permit post-expiry extension applications, overruling the Calcutta High Court's decision in Rohan Builders.

1 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Despite Delay in Filing Application Under Section 48(1) of Maharashtra Stamp Act. Limitation Bars Remedy Not Right, State Cannot Retain Double Stamp Duty on Same Transaction.

27 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Nanji Dana Patel, entered into a development agreement with Keshav Krishanlal Syngal on 3 March 2014, paying stamp duty of Rs.78,65,00...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Law Dispute Over Financial Upgradation Under ACP and MACP Schemes. The Court upheld the respondent's entitlement to financial benefits, distinguishing the case from precedent involving non-functional upgradation, and noted compliance with the Tribunal's order without ruling on the time-bar objection raised by the appellants.

24 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute over financial upgradation benefits under service schemes. The respondent, a TV News and Film Librarian at Doordarshan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Case Due to Liberty Reserved by High Court — Limitation Period Not Applicable When Claimants Pursued Earlier Remedies. The Court held that the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was not barred by limitation because the claimants had challenged the acquisition and the High Court had reserved liberty to seek enhancement, and the reference was filed within six months of the dismissal of the special leave petition.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the original claimants (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had upheld the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Application for Correction of Clerical Error Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Award.

20 Sep 2019

The petitioners, Dr. Writer's Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and two individuals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Gratuity Appeal — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 7(7) First Proviso Imposes Absolute Bar on Entertaining Appeal Filed After 120 Days from Receipt of Controlling Authority's Order.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dated 18.11.2014,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Beyond 30-Day Condonable Period Cannot Be Excused Even If Sufficient Cause Is Shown. The court held that the limitation period for setting aside an award is three months plus 30 days, and no further extension is permissible, rejecting the petition filed one day after the 30-day period.

2 Apr 2016

The applicant, M/s Tirumala Roadways, filed a notice of motion seeking condonation of 30 days delay in filing an arbitration petition under Section 34...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes District Judge's Order in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Petitioner Allowed to File Objections Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. The court held that the District Judge's order rejecting the petitioner's application to file objections was without jurisdiction as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to file objections before the award was made rule of the court.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, T Younis, was the owner of land bearing Sy.No.503/A1 and 503/B2 in Amarathi village, Hospet. His land was compulsorily acquired by the...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows TIIC's Recovery Petition Against Guarantors in SFC Act Case — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Liability of Guarantors Under Sections 31(a) and 31(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Survives Liquidation of Principal Borrower and Receipt of Amount from Official Liquidator.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (TIIC), a State Financial Corporation, filed an original petition under Sections ...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)