Search Results for "uniformity"

625 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 625 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Shalarth Identity Despite Deputy Director's Objection to Approval. Approval by Education Officer (Secondary) is binding on Deputy Director for Shalarth identity purposes.

The petitioners, including a teacher (Petitioner No.1) and the school management, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondent authoriti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Change of Opinion. Reassessment Notice and Order Quashed as Assessing Officer Had No Fresh Tangible Material to Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Aroni Commercials Limited, challenged a notice dated 28 March 2013 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Foreign Vessel in Admiralty Suit — Plaintiffs' Claim for Supply of Bunkers and Stores Falls Within Admiralty Jurisdiction Under Section 4(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017.

The plaintiffs, Universal Marine and Ramanand Padiyar, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.T. Hartati (a Singapore-flagged vessel) and its ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1171 of 2006 seeking declaration that a gift deed dated 10/11/2005 executed by defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise License Renewal for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right or interest in the renewal of a foreign liquor license under the Goa Excise Duty Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Shri Shailesh Kothawale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, see...