Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2026 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2026 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Personal Hearing Under Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Acquisition of Agricultural Land Quashed as Petitioners Were Denied Opportunity of Being Heard Before Declaration Under Section 6.

The petitioners, fifteen individuals who were owners of various agricultural lands in Loni, Taluka Warud, District Amaravati, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Acquisition Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Land Acquired Under 1894 Act but Not Compensated Due to Unfulfilled Alternate Land Offer Entitles Petitioners to Compensation Under 2013 Act.

The petitioners, Shital Anna Walawade, Neminath Anna Walawade, and Suman Anna Walawade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Industrial Development Due to Non-Compliance with Section 28 of KIADB Act, 1966. Preliminary Notification Lapsed as Final Notification Not Issued Within Prescribed Period of Two Years.

The petitioners, landowners from Gavenahalli Village, Hassan Taluk and District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Police Housing. Land Acquisition for Public Purpose Upheld as Compensation Determined Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, owners of land in Daund, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land by the State of Maharashtra for construction of residential q...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Land Allotment Under Displaced Persons Act Due to Laches. Court Holds That Displaced Persons Act, 1954 Does Not Envisage Issuance of Orders by Custodian for Execution of Compensation Claims.

The petitioner, Chandru Mirchandani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...