Search Results for "ownership transfer"

2075 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2075 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen in Retrenchment Compensation Claim Against Electricity Company Under Industrial Disputes Act. Transfer of Undertaking to State Government Did Not Satisfy Section 25FF Proviso Conditions; Workmen Deemed Retrenched and Entitled to Compensation from Previous Employer.

The dispute arose out of the transfer of an electricity distribution undertaking owned by the South Arcot Electricity Distribution Company Limited to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against DDA's Demand for Unearned Increase in Amalgamation Case. Amalgamation of Companies Under Court Order Does Not Amount to 'Transfer' Under Lease Deed Clause II(4)(a).

The appellant, M/s. Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. (now M/s. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.), was the transferee company resulting from the amalgamation of M/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Enforcement of Security Interest Against Developer and Its Directors Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Trustee Is a 'Secured Creditor' Entitled to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Despite Pending RERA Proceedings.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, a debenture trustee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Collector, Pune, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a condition imposed by the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (a unit of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...