Search Results for "mechanical application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "mechanical application"

1343 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1343 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Mechanical Exercise of Power and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order bearing year 2021 passed in 2022 and failure to consider bail conditions vitiates subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Mujib s/o Abdul Shaikh, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad, under Section 3(2) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director for Company Tax Dues — Holds Revenue Failed to Prove Lack of Diligence or Recovery from Company. Petitioner not liable as director under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for taxes of Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10 because Revenue did not establish that tax could not be recovered from the company despite reasonable efforts.

12 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Prakash B. Kamat, a mechanical engineer, developed a smart card-based ticketing solution and incorporated Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Complainant's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Material Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

30 Aug 2022

The appellant, Sayaji Dashrath Kawade, was serving as Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunications at Aurangabad. The complainant, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Reinstatement Order in Employee Absenteeism Case — Tribunal's Failure to Properly Consider Charges and Mechanical Grant of Back Wages Found Unsustainable. The Court Quashed the Tribunal's Judgment and Remanded the Matter for Fresh Adjudication, Holding That Treating Absence as Leave Without Pay Does Not Automatically Bar a Disciplinary Enquiry.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioners, an educational institution and its engineering college, challenged the judgment dated 28.02.2005 of the University and College Tribun...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Non-Prosecution. Petitioner Failed to Appear or Take Steps to Prosecute the Petition, Leading to Dismissal.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Qader Khan s/o Ismail Khan, a resident of Parbhani district, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Ceiling Act — Petitioner's Father's Land Holding Incorrectly Calculated Due to Non-Exclusion of Irrigated Land. The court remanded the matter to the Additional Divisional Commissioner for fresh consideration with proper application of the Amended Ceiling Act provisions regarding irrigated land.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sidhling Rangnath Ghongade, a resident of Ainapurwadi, Taluka Paranda, District Osmanabad, filed a writ petition challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Suo Moto Revision Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act Due to Inordinate Delay. Notice Issued After 16 Years from Non-Surplus Declaration Held Unreasonable and Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal representatives of deceased Marotrao Khupse, challenged a notice dated 13 July 1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aura...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes AICTE Closure Order for Retrospective Application of Norms and Violation of Natural Justice. AICTE's Approval Process Handbook Norms Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to College Established in 1992.

3 May 2019

The case involves a college established by a Trust in 1992 with initial approval from AICTE. The college expanded and shifted its campus over time. Af...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)