Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"

1310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tribal Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal of Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions for Sale of Tribal Land.

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, owned land in Valshind, Thane. He sought to sell the land to respondent No. 6, a non-tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Headmaster Challenging Termination — Termination Upheld Despite Interim Orders Allowing Continued Service. Enquiry Committee Validly Constituted and School Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction in Reappreciating Evidence.

The appellant, Dadarao Lakkhuji Dambhare, was a Headmaster employed by respondent no.1, Rashtraseva Samaj, a registered public trust. He was terminate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Unstamped Arbitration Agreement. Court Must Impound Unstamped Agreement Under Stamp Act Before Proceeding Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act.

The appeal arose from a sub-contract between Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. (appellant) and Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (respondent) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Excess Land Due to Repeal and Non-Completion of Proceedings. Demand for Rs 6,09,66,477 raised under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 set aside as proceedings were not finalized before the Act's repeal and the land was not vested in the State.

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...