Bombay High Court Allows Tribal Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal of Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions for Sale of Tribal Land.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, owned land in Valshind, Thane. He sought to sell the land to respondent No. 6, a non-tribal, due to financial need. Under Sections 36 and 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, prior approval from the Collector is required for such a sale. The petitioner applied for approval, but the Collector refused by letter dated 5 November 2020, relying on a government circular dated 22 September 2020 from the State Government which stated that prior approval cannot be granted if the land is in a no-development zone. The petitioner challenged this refusal in the High Court. The court examined the statutory provisions of Section 36A, which only requires the Collector to be satisfied that the sale is for the benefit of the tribal. The court held that the government circular cannot override the statute and that the Collector must consider the application on its own merits. The court quashed the Collector's letter and the government circular to the extent it was used to deny approval, and directed the Collector to reconsider the application without reference to the circular. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Land Revenue - Prior Approval for Sale of Tribal Land - Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - The petitioner, a tribal, sought prior approval to sell his land to a non-tribal. The Collector refused based on a government circular stating that approval cannot be granted if the land is in a no-development zone. The court held that the circular cannot override the statutory provisions of Section 36A, which only requires the Collector to be satisfied that the sale is for the benefit of the tribal. The court directed the Collector to reconsider the application without reference to the circular. (Paras 1-10)

B) Administrative Law - Government Circulars - Binding Effect - Government circulars cannot override statutory provisions. The court held that a circular that imposes additional conditions not found in the statute is ultra vires and cannot be used to deny a statutory right. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Collector can refuse to grant prior approval under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, for sale of tribal land based on a government circular that imposes additional conditions not found in the statute.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the Collector's letter dated 05.11.2020 and the government circular dated 22.09.2020 to the extent it was used to deny approval, and directed the Collector to reconsider the application without reference to the circular.

Law Points

  • Prior approval under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
  • 1966
  • cannot be refused based on government circulars that impose additional conditions not found in the statute
  • Government circulars cannot override statutory provisions
  • The Collector must consider the application on its own merits and grant approval if conditions are satisfied
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (04) 18

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.98190 OF 2020

2021-04-20

S.J. KATHAWALLA, PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN

Mr. N.V. Walawalkar, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Surel Shah and Mr. Amey Sawant for the Petitioner, Mr. Suresh Sabrad alongwith Ms. Neha Parte for Respondent No.6, Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the State

Kisan Songya Bangara

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector Thane, The Deputy Collector, The Divisional Commissioner, Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority, Vijendra Shamlal Sharma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging refusal of prior approval under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for sale of tribal land.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Collector's letter dated 05.11.2020 refusing prior approval and government circular dated 22.09.2020, and direction to grant prior approval.

Filing Reason

Collector refused prior approval based on government circular stating that approval cannot be granted if land is in no-development zone.

Issues

Whether the Collector can refuse prior approval under Section 36A based on a government circular that imposes additional conditions not found in the statute.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the government circular cannot override the statutory provisions of Section 36A, which only requires the Collector to be satisfied that the sale is for the benefit of the tribal. Respondent State argued that the circular was issued to protect tribal interests and that the Collector was bound by it.

Ratio Decidendi

Government circulars cannot override statutory provisions. The Collector must consider applications under Section 36A on their own merits and cannot refuse approval based on additional conditions imposed by circulars not found in the statute.

Judgment Excerpts

By the above Writ Petition, the Petitioner interalia seeks the following relief : (b) That by an appropriate writ, order or direction, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the letter dated 05.11.2020 issued by the Respondent No.2 Collector, Thane thereby refusing to grant prior approval u/s. 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as well as the letter dated 22.09.2020... The court held that the government circular cannot override the statutory provisions of Section 36A.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the Collector's refusal to grant prior approval under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The petition was taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission by consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: 36, 36A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion in Subordinate Judicial Service — Petitioner Failed to Establish Supersession or Right to Promotion. Promotion from Class IV to Class III is not a matter of right and is subject to qualification, s...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Section 9 Application Under Arbitration Act — Partnership Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Clause 14 of Partnership Agreement Constitutes Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 9 o...