Search Results for "invalid notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "invalid notification"

1322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1322 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Suspension Order of Group C Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 10(4)(b) of KCS (CCA) Rules, 1957 — Suspension Without Contemplation of Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid. The court held that the suspension order must record reasons and be based on contemplation of disciplinary proceedings, failing which it is unsustainable.

11 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Shri S. Nagaraja, a Group C employee working as a Second Division Assistant at the Shivamogga City Corporation, challenged an order da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

17 Aug 2017

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Municipal Councillors and Appointment of Administrator. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 41 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 in Removal Orders.

10 Feb 2026

The matter comprised two writ petitions. W.P. No. 101601/2025 was filed by elected councillors of Gadag-Betageri City Municipal Council challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

13 Feb 2019

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Act No.4 of 2015 and Claim for Additional Increment by Aided School Staff. The case examines whether aided school employees are entitled to Kannada language increment on par with government staff and if the amendment nullifying such benefit is valid.

24 Jul 2020

The writ petitions were filed by teaching and non-teaching staff of private aided educational institutions in Karnataka, challenging the constitutiona...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.

9 Dec 1968

The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reservation Notification for Sarpanch Posts Exceeding 50% Limit in Nagpur District. Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes in Gram Panchayat Sarpanch Elections Must Not Exceed 50% of Total Posts as per Section 30(4)(a) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Gunwanta Pundlik Kale, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Jalalkheda in Nagpur District, elected in September 2018 for a five-year ter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Vesting Order — Petitioner's Title Not Extinguished by Surrender of Possession by Third Party. Constituted Attorney of Partners and Owners of Land Successfully Challenges Competent Authority's Order Vesting Land in State under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

21 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Pankaj S. Parikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a declarat...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)