Search Results for "firm name"

2385 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2385 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sujal Pharma, a proprietorship firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged a blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Recovery Suits, Holding That Suits Against Guarantors Were Barred by Limitation. The court held that limitation for suit against guarantor runs from date of default by principal debtor, not from date of guarantee, under Article 55 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves three first appeals arising from a common judgment and decree passed by the City Civil Judge, Court No. 11, Ahmedabad, in Civil Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Hospital-Doctor Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and prima facie disputes are sufficient for appointment, leaving merits to arbitrator.

The petitioner, MIOT Hospitals Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal and Dismisses Foreclosure Suit Due to Improper Joinder and Limitation Bar. Court Reverses High Court's Addition of Plaintiffs and Defendants Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as the Added Parties' Claims Were Time-Barred Under Section 22 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.

The dispute arose from a mortgage executed in 1934 in the former State of Hyderabad. The mortgage amount became due in 1943. The first respondent, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Suits for Recovery of Fixed Deposit Proceeds Allegedly Appropriated by Bank for Third-Party Dues. Plaintiffs contend that letter authorizing adjustment was obtained under economic duress, rendering it void.

The dispute arose from two recovery suits filed by sister concerns, M/s. Palbro International and Manekji Nensey & Sons, against The Federal Bank Ltd....