INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2012
14 Oct 2014The appeal before the High Court arose out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissing the assessee's appeal and upholdi...
Search Results for "development agreements"
1460 result(s) found
Found 1460 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.
15 Apr 2011The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conveyance Deed and Society Registration Under MOFA and MCS Act — Conveyance Deed Executed Without Proper Authority and Society Registration Based on Defective Deed Set Aside. The court held that the Competent Authority under Section 11 of MOFA must conduct a proper inquiry before executing a conveyance, and a society registered under the MCS Act based on an invalid conveyance cannot be sustained.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, Maki Homi Chibber, through her constituted attorney, filed a writ petition challenging a conveyance deed dated 30.04.2019 executed by ...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conveyance Deed and Society Registration Under MOFA and MCS Act — Conveyance Deed Executed Without Consent of Allottees and Without Compliance with Section 11 of MOFA Held Void. The court held that the Competent Authority under MOFA cannot execute a conveyance deed in favour of a society that does not represent all allottees, and the registration of such society under the MCS Act without the consent of all allottees is invalid.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, Maki Homi Chibber, an allottee of a flat in a building constructed under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion ...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Saleable FSI and Possession of Property. Court restrains respondents from alienating saleable FSI and disturbing possession pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9 Apr 2012The petitioners, Atul Resorts and Hospitality India Pvt. Ltd. and Atul Projects India Ltd., filed two arbitration petitions under Section 9 of the Arb...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Societies in Section 9 Arbitration Petitions Against Federation and Developer. Termination of Bipartite MoU and Cancellation of MHADA Layout NOC Eroded Foundation of Tripartite Development Agreement, Meriting Interim Protection from Interference.
1 Aug 2025These were two commercial arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Borivali Shree Ganesh Nateshwa...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement.
30 Sep 2024The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim ...
- 852
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...
- 148
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.
30 Nov -0001The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...
- 96
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.
30 Apr 2026The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...
- 45
