Search Results for "adjoining building"

652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Unregistered Partnership Firm Under Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Barred as Firm Not Registered, No Exception for Suits Relating to Partnership Property Applies.

The plaintiffs, seven individuals, filed a suit seeking a declaration that they are partners of the firm Laxmi Developers and for an injunction restra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Anant Chandru Wake, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 30/7/1994 for the murder of Mangesh Sawant, a Fores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Right of Way Dispute. Wajib-ul-arz Entry Held Conclusive Evidence of Easement Right Under Section 13(b) of Easements Act, 1882.

The case involves a dispute over a right of way between two sets of parties in village Bhombodi, Tahsil Tirora, District Gondia. The respondents/plain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Cancellation of Letter of Intent for Non-Compliance. SRA's Power to Revoke LoI for Failure to Obtain 70% Consent and Complete Rehabilitation Upheld.

The petitioners, M/s. Platinum Realty and M/s. Jaihind SRA Cooperative Society (Proposed), filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Slum ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Permanent Injunction Involving Temple Dispute. Plaintiffs Sought Injunction to Restrain Interference with Possession of Temple Premises in Residential Complex.

The appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed against the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2016 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...