Search Results for "Ceiling area"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Ceiling area"

497 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 497 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka examines legality of change of category for Gram Panchayat Adhyaksha election under the Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The principal question concerns the eligibility of a general category elected member to contest a reserved post of Adhyaksha by obtaining a caste certificate after election.

31 Oct 2023

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka arose from a dispute concerning the eligibility of a Gram Panchayat member to contest for the pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

1 Dec 2016

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Dispossession. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Suit for Possession Based on Title Was Barred by Limitation.

13 Apr 2022

The present First Appeal arises from a judgment of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in S.C. Suit No.5551/1990, where the suit was decreed in favor of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)