Search Results for "water supply agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "water supply agreement"

709 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 709 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Licence Agreement Dispute, Upholds Damages for Use and Occupation. Court holds that even if relationship is treated as tenancy, tenant is liable for rent/damages during closure period under Section 108 of Transfer of Property Act.

1 Oct 2020

The dispute arose from two licence agreements dated 27.08.1990 between the appellants (M/s Arun Kumar Kamal Kumar & Ors.) and the respondents (M/s Sel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Entitlement for Daily Wager Absorbed as Clerk — Continuous Service Counted from Initial Appointment. Municipal Council's contention that daily wage period cannot be counted for gratuity rejected under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

27 Sep 2019

The Municipal Council, Achalpur, filed a writ petition challenging two concurrent judgments: the order dated 26.06.2015 of the Controlling Authority u...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

19 Nov 2025

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Seeking Quashing of Awards in Various Industrial Disputes.

4 Nov 2022

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution Petition for Specific Performance Despite Delay, Holding Limitation for Execution Runs from Date of Decree Becoming Final. The court clarified that under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the 12-year period for execution of a decree for specific performance commences from the date the decree becomes final, not from the date of the decree.

13 Jun 2013

The petitioner, the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.1208 of 1994, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale dated 25th...

High Court

High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging Closure of Pathway and Old Bridge by Power Company; Issue of Whether Spillway is Public Road and Whether Closure is Unauthorised Considered

10 Aug 2006

The dispute arose from a public interest litigation filed by a retired municipal engineer and resident of Lonavala, challenging the closure of a pathw...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against Indian Steel Manufacturer.

13 Oct 2015

The case concerns a petition filed under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitral a...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)