High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against Indian Steel Manufacturer.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerns a petition filed under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 8 June 2011. The petitioner, an Italian company, entered into contracts with the respondent, an Indian steel manufacturer, for the purchase of prime hot dip galvanised steel coils. Disputes arose when the respondent failed to supply the goods despite amendments to letters of credit and advance payments made by the petitioner. After the vessel carrying part of the goods was damaged and arrested, the respondent sought renegotiation of prices, which the petitioner refused. The petitioner initiated arbitration, resulting in an award in its favour. The petition sought declaration of enforceability of the award as a decree of the high court and recovery of costs. The factual background details the series of communications, contract modifications, and failures to perform dating back to 2005-2006, including the involvement of a sister concern, Nagit Trading LLC, for part of the supply.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the foreign arbitral award dated 8 June 2011 is enforceable as a decree of the Court under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Enforcement of foreign award under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (10) 87

Arbitration Petition No.84 of 2013

2015-10-13

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

2015:BHC-OS:13052

Mr.Nikhil Sakhardande, Ms.Sonali Mathur, Ms.Priyanka Shetty for petitioner; Ms.Rajani Iyer, Senior Advocate, Mr.Jayesh Ashar, Mr.Dhaval Patil for respondent

Sideralba S.p.A.

Shree Precoated Steels Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for enforcement of foreign arbitral award under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the arbitral award dated 8 June 2011 is enforceable as a decree of the Court and payment of costs

Filing Reason

The respondent failed to comply with the arbitral award dated 8 June 2011

Issues

Whether the foreign arbitral award dated 8 June 2011 is enforceable as a decree of the High Court under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Arbitration Petition No.84 of 2013 seeking enforcement of the foreign arbitral award dated 8 June 2011. The matter was reserved for judgment on 4 September 2015 and pronounced on 13 October 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: 46, 47
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to University’s Denial of Permanent Approval to Contractually Appointed Lecturers. Petitioners Alleged Violation of UGC Exemption Norms After Acquiring M.Phil During Continuous Service.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against In...