Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Seeking Quashing of Awards in Various Industrial Disputes.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-23 20:53:21
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010069662020_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (11) 41

WRIT PETITION NO.6795 OF 2020 (L-TER)

2022-11-04

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

S.N.MURTHY, SOMASHEKAR, T.S. ANANTHARAM, J. KANIKARAJ

STANZEN LINKS (INDIA) LTD.

SRI. H.V. NAGESHA and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging awards of the First Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the awards dated 21.12.2019 in various I.D. numbers.

Previous Decisions

Awards passed by the First Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru dated 21.12.2019 in multiple I.D. numbers.

Procedural History

The petitioner-employer filed writ petitions before the High Court challenging awards of the Labour Court. The Managing Director of M/S. Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. was impleaded as second respondent per order dated 16.08.2022. The matters were clubbed together and heard on 04.11.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
quashing of award labour court industrial dispute

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 354 IPC Case. Material Contradictions in Prosecutrix's Testimony Led to Benefit of Doubt Being Given to Accused. 2026-09-20 02:51:12
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Madras High Court in Execution Sale Dispute Under CPC. Section 47 Objections Barred After Prior Final Order, Legal Representative Lacks Higher Rights. 2026-09-20 02:51:10
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Income Tax Dispute — Jurisdiction under Section 263 U...

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. The prosecut...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute Due to Lack of Consent. App...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Lost Your Password?