Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Seeking Quashing of Awards in Various Industrial Disputes.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-19 10:18:26
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010069662020_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (11) 41

WRIT PETITION NO.6795 OF 2020 (L-TER)

2022-11-04

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

S.N.MURTHY, SOMASHEKAR, T.S. ANANTHARAM, J. KANIKARAJ

STANZEN LINKS (INDIA) LTD.

SRI. H.V. NAGESHA and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging awards of the First Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the awards dated 21.12.2019 in various I.D. numbers.

Previous Decisions

Awards passed by the First Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru dated 21.12.2019 in multiple I.D. numbers.

Procedural History

The petitioner-employer filed writ petitions before the High Court challenging awards of the Labour Court. The Managing Director of M/S. Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. was impleaded as second respondent per order dated 16.08.2022. The matters were clubbed together and heard on 04.11.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
quashing of award labour court industrial dispute

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements. 2026-11-04 04:34:17
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Delayed Possession. Landowner's Claim for Additional Amou... 2026-11-04 04:34:16
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition Jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Police Officer in Preventive Detention Case...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process...

Supreme Court Allows Recruitment Appeal in Police Constable Case Due to Flawed Medical Ass...

Lost Your Password?