Search Results for "taxing provision interpretation"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Time-Barred Search Proceedings. Reassessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 Based on Search in 2024 Invalid as It Exceeds Ten-Year Limit Under Section 153A of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Per Pre-Amendment Provisions Applicable Under Section 152(3).

The dispute involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by an assessee challenging a reassessment notice issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Notice for Assessment Year 2015-16 as Time-Barred Under Amended Finance Act Provisions -- Petitioner Challenges Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Search Documents

The High Court of Gujarat allowed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Income Tax Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Time-Barred Proceedings -- Reassessment Based on Search Documents Found Invalid Under Amended Provisions

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and Direction to Frame Scheme for Charitable Trust. High Court Held Will Dated 27.9.1968 Was Mutual and Joint, and Alienations by Surviving Spouse Void.

These appeals arose from Original Suit No. 76 of 1981, filed by Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam as plaintiff, seeking adm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to PSS Guidelines Exemption as Market Committees Assert Entitlement to Fees under Section 31 of Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The Court examined the validity of clause B(ii) which required State exemption from all duties on PSS operations.

The writ petition was filed by the Maharashtra State Market Committee Co-operative Federation Ltd., representing over 290 Agricultural Produce Market ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...