Search Results for "road improvement"

1216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition for Minor Irrigation Tank — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Acre with 30% Solatium and 12% Additional Market Value. Comparable Sales Method Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Fix Enhanced Compensation.

The appellants, whose land was acquired for construction of a minor irrigation tank, challenged the judgment and award of the Reference Court dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prasada Sudhakar Kulkarni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of the victim. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Accused's Appeals, Upholding Conviction in Murder Case Based on Corroborated Eye-Witness Account and Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, and 506 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Proved Homicidal Death and Accused's Role in Killing and Destruction of Evidence.

The case arose from an incident on 17 May 2005, where the deceased, Mahadeva @ Nagamadegowda, husband of accused No.1 (Smt. Malathi), was murdered. Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...