Search Results for "permission denied"

3134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 Indian Penal Code. Appeal challenged reliance on last seen together, confession under Section 164 CrPC, and diary evidence in proving murder of mother-in-law.

The appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Five Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and evidence suffered from material contradictions and improvements.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by five accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's contributory negligence assessed at 50% for sitting on the footboard of a bus, reducing insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Gulam Mohammad, sustained injuries while traveling as a passenger in a bus owned by Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1272 OF 2019

The first appeal was preferred by the original opponent against the order cancelling her appointment as guardian of her husband. The appellant was app...