Search Results for "Special Land Acquisition Officer"

2069 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2069 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Bridge Construction — Upholds Section 5A Report and Section 6 Declaration. Petitioners' Objections Regarding Residential Structures Rejected as Acquisition Was for Public Purpose and Due Process Followed.

The petitioners, owners of land in Sanguem, Goa, challenged the acquisition of their property for construction of a parallel bridge. They purchased po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses BSNL's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation of Rs. 790 per sq. mtr. and Rent Upheld. Non-agricultural land within municipal limits valued justly under Section 126 of MRTP Act, with rent for prior possession from 1992 to 2002.

The appeal was filed by the Acquiring Body, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), against the judgment and award of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Bhoom...