Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

363 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 363 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Scrutinize and Release Arrears Under RTE Act to Private Schools. Court orders State to determine eligibility and quantum of reimbursement within eight weeks following earlier precedent.

The petitioners, eight private educational institutions, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the respondents, in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award for Lack of Valid Reference Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Petitioner's Signature Obtained Without Proper Procedure Renders Award Void.

The petitioner, Madhukar Baburao Shete, a senior citizen with 95% physical disability, challenged an award passed by the Lok Adalat in Regular Civil S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Appeal by Widow Under Section 9 of MEPS Act. Widow of Dismissed Employee Can Maintain Appeal as Right Survives to Legal Representative for Service and Monetary Claims.

The petitioners, Yogeshwari Shikshan Sanstha and Swami Ramanand Tirth College, challenged an order of the School Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 15.1.2016...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Interest Claim — Limitation Period for Suit Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Three Years. Suit filed after 11 years from compensation payment held barred by limitation.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra and the Executive Engineer against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate ...