Bombay High Court Directs State to Scrutinize and Release Arrears Under RTE Act to Private Schools. Court orders State to determine eligibility and quantum of reimbursement within eight weeks following earlier precedent.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 101
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eight private educational institutions, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the respondents, including the Union of India, the State of Maharashtra, and the Director of Education, to release arrears of entitlement grants claimed under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The sole request was for the release of these arrears. The court noted that similar relief had been sought in earlier petitions and referred to the order in Writ Petition No.6020 of 2024 (Gurukul English Medium School Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) dated 2nd May 2024. Following that precedent, the court directed the respondents to scrutinize the case of each petitioner within eight weeks and determine their eligibility and the quantum of reimbursement. The petition was disposed of with these directions, and rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Right to Education - Reimbursement of Grants - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Petitioners, private schools, sought direction for release of arrears of entitlement grants under the RTE Act. Court directed the State to scrutinize each petitioner's case within eight weeks and determine eligibility and quantum of reimbursement, following earlier orders in similar petitions. Held that the State must process and release legitimate dues expeditiously (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State is obligated to release arrears of entitlement grants under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 to private schools.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to scrutinize the case of each petitioner within eight weeks and determine eligibility and quantum of reimbursement. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act
  • 2009
  • Reimbursement of grants
  • Arrears
  • Scrutiny by State
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:53068-DB

Writ Petition No. 16035 of 2025

2025-12-02

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Ashwin D. Bhobe

2025:BHC-AS:53068-DB

Vaibhav Ugle, Shubham Dasvant (for Petitioners); P. P. Kakade, V. G. Badgujar (for Respondent-State)

Union of India, State of Maharashtra, Director of Education, Pune, District Education Officer (Primary) Nashik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction for release of arrears of entitlement grants under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (private schools) sought a direction to the respondents to release the amount of arrears claimed as entitlement grants under the RTE Act.

Filing Reason

Non-release of arrears of entitlement grants under the RTE Act by the State authorities.

Previous Decisions

Similar relief was granted in Writ Petition No.6020 of 2024 (Gurukul English Medium School Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) dated 2nd May 2024.

Issues

Whether the State is obligated to release arrears of entitlement grants under the RTE Act to private schools.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for release of arrears; State did not oppose but sought time to scrutinize.

Ratio Decidendi

The State must scrutinize claims for reimbursement under the RTE Act and release legitimate dues expeditiously, following earlier precedents.

Judgment Excerpts

The sole request made in this Writ Petition is for a direction to release the amount of arrears which the Petitioners claim, towards entitlement grants under the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Following the order passed in Writ Petition No.6020 of 2024 (Gurukul English Medium School Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.), dated 2nd May 2024, the following directions are issued :- (i) Time of eight weeks is granted to the Respondents/State of Maharashtra to scrutinize the case of each Petitioner. (ii) The eligibility as well as quantum of reimbursement, would be determined by the concerned Respondent.

Procedural History

The petition was mentioned out of turn, rule was issued and made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with consent. The court referred to an earlier order in Writ Petition No.6020 of 2024 and issued similar directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Dowry Harassment in Bride Burning Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302, 498A, 201 IPC. The court held that the last seen theory and the failure of the appell...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligent Driving and Lack of Proper Investigation — Compensation Enhanced for Death of Pedestrian. The Court held that the petitioners proved negligence through evidence and...