KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "Assistant Commissioner's Order"
5426 result(s) found
Found 5426 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Petition Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Mistake in Return of Income Due to Inadvertent Error by Accountant. Court holds that the Principal Commissioner ought to have considered the petitioner's explanation of a bona fide mistake and set aside the intimation under Section 143(1) to allow rectification.
8 Apr 2021The petitioner, an individual, filed her return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 on 20 July 2018, showing total income of Rs. 27,05,646/- from ho...
- 52
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in SC/ST Act Case — Sets Aside Caste Certificate Cancellation Order for Lack of Application of Mind. Special Deputy Commissioner's Order Quashed as Authorities Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Violated Principles of Natural Justice.
18 Nov 2013The appellant, Smt. Earamma @ Muni Veeramma (since deceased, represented by her legal heir Abbanna), filed a writ appeal before the Karnataka High Cou...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Private Complaint Case. The court held that once cognizance is taken and process issued under Section 204 CrPC, the Magistrate cannot be directed to conduct a re-enquiry under Section 202 CrPC.
10 Apr 2019The petitioner, Mrs. Jessie Mary Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 0...
- 40
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.
16 Jun 2026The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.
14 Jun 2010The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.
25 Sep 2018The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.
30 Jul 2013The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...
- 220
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition and Income Tax Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence. Petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearings, leading to dismissal for default under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC.
12 Aug 2025The petitioner, Vaibhav Maruti Dombale, filed a Writ Petition (No. 1489 of 2025) and an Income Tax Appeal (No. 21746 of 2025) before the Bombay High C...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981; Representations and Delay Issues Considered. Court Finds No Merit in Allegation of Non-Forwarding of Representation as Detenu's Son Voluntarily Took Back Copies, While Delay Explanation Was Noted.
5 May 2006The petitioner-detenu challenged his detention order dated 22.06.2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bo...
- 48
