Search Results for "Appeal Against Order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Appeal Against Order"

30278 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30278 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Characterizing Order Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act as Administrative; Petition to be Heard by Division Bench. The Division Bench Rules That Externment Appeal Order Does Not Involve Quasi-Judicial Determination and Thus Falls Outside 'Order' Under Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

15 Sep 2016

The case arose from a Criminal Writ Petition filed by the petitioner challenging an externment order and the subsequent appellate order confirming the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Hearing at Admission Stage of Victim's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. — No Leave Required, Summary Dismissal Permissible After Hearing. The court held that the hearing at admission stage is not a full-fledged hearing but an opportunity to show sufficient ground for interference under Section 384 Cr.P.C.

1 Feb 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of hearing at the admission stage of an appeal filed by a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2016

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Not Applicable When Subsequent Suit Relates to Different Property. Decree Holders' Right to Possession Upheld as Judgment Debtor's Application for Stay Was Based on a Suit Involving Different Subject Matter, Constituting Abuse of Process.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession and mesne profits in O.S. No. 3/1971 (later renumbered O.S. No. 79/2003) against the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Cannot Be Invoked After Decree Is Passed. Execution Court Erred in Staying Execution Based on Subsequent Suit Filed by Judgment Debtor After Decree.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession in O.S. No. 79/2003 (originally O.S. No. 3/1971) against the respondent (judgment de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking to Treat Oral Dictation as Final Order — Signed Order Prevails Over Dictation in Open Court. The Court held that the signed order uploaded on 12.02.2026 is the binding order, not the oral dictation, and the Judge has the right to change the order until it is signed under Order XII of the Supreme Court Rules.

12 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed by respondents in a disposed civil appeal, seeking clarification that the order dictated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit for Declaration Regarding Cheque Security — Revisional Court's Order Rejecting Plaint Restored. The court held that a suit seeking declaration that a cheque was handed over as security is barred under Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and lacks cause of action, warranting rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

21 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by defendant no.1, M/s Frost International Limited, against the order of the Orissa High Court which had se...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that failure to supply grounds in Telugu, the only language known to the detenu, vitiated the detention order and ordered his release.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Jayamma, wife of the detenu Giddappa @ Lambu Giddappa, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Refusing to Summon Defence Witnesses in MCOC Case. Issue Pertains to Relevance of Confessions of Other Accused Persons Recorded Under Section 18 of MCOC Act in a Separate Trial.

26 Nov 2012

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MC...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Claim Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Prior Attachment and Lack of Possession. The court held that a claim petition under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC is not maintainable when the property was attached before judgment and the claimant was not in possession at the time of attachment.

23 May 2018

The appellant, Swamy H.L., filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC against the judgment and decree dated 19.09.2008 passed by the First Ap...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)