Search Results for "general order"

18717 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18717 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners to Obtain Commission to Singapore Under Section 27 of Arbitration Act. Issuing Commission to Foreign Country Does Not Amount to Change of Venue of Arbitration.

The petition was filed under section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the two petitioners, who were the original respondents in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Review Petitions Against Orders in Writ Petitions Involving Income Tax Assessments of Cooperative Societies. Petitioners Seek Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Read with Section 114 CPC of Orders Passed on 05.02.2020 and 11.02.2020.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of review petitions filed by various cooperative societies seeking review of orders dated 05.02...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Applicability of Written Statement Time Limit to Counter-Claim in Commercial Suits. The Court Examined Whether the 120-Day Limit Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiffs' Reply to Counter-Claims Governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

This matter arose from a commercial suit for recovery of money filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants). The defendan...