Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "examination valuation"
473 result(s) found
Found 473 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Partition Appeal and Dismisses Cross-Appeal in Property Dispute — Suit for Partition and Permanent Injunction Partly Decreed. Court holds that the plaintiff established joint family status and the suit property was ancestral, but the trial court erred in dismissing the suit for partition on the ground of limitation and non-joinder of necessary parties.
30 Mar 2026The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and decree in O.S.No.250 of 2015 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions J...
- 107
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Case Due to Limitation Issue — Notice Under Section 12(2) Not Served. Limitation for Reference Begins Only Upon Receipt of Notice Under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
10 Feb 2026The case involves a first appeal filed by the heirs of the original claimant, Pagi Bhemaji Dhiraji (since deceased), challenging the judgment and orde...
- 93
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Case Due to Non-Receipt of Notice Under Section 12(2) of the Act — Limitation Period Begins from Receipt of Notice. The court held that the reference court erred in dismissing the reference on limitation grounds without considering the non-receipt of notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
5 Feb 2026The present appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 01.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bayad, District: Aravalli in...
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding High Court's Decree for Possession and Injunction. The Court held that the suit was not under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, making the appeal competent, and rejected belated applications for amendment of written statement and additional grounds at the appellate stage.
29 Mar 2023The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent) seeking permanent injunction and later amended to include prayers for possessio...
- 239
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Snatching Case Due to Lack of Identification Parade and Recovery. Conviction Under Section 379 IPC Set Aside as Identification in Police Station Without Test Identification Parade is Unreliable and No Recovery from Appellant.
19 Dec 2022The appellant, Alam Adam Mansuri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Special MCOCA Case No.4 of 2013 for the offence p...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Co-operative Bank in Government Securities Scam Case — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Entitlement to Return of Securities or Recovery of Value. The Court held that the plaintiff bank failed to prove its title to the securities and that the transactions were void ab initio due to fraud, and the bank was not entitled to any relief.
7 Apr 2021The appellant, The Amravati Peoples’ Co-operative Bank Ltd. (plaintiff), filed a suit for return of government securities sold by it or in the alter...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Family Court Order Directing Husband to Pay Full Ad Valorem Court Fees on Claim for Recovery of Amount in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Fees Act, 1959 - Section 8 - Inquiry into Court Fees - Held that when a party claims a specific sum of money, court fees must be paid on that amount, and the court can treat an application as an inquiry under Section 8.
6 Apr 2018The petitioner-husband, Shri Vijay Jagdish Chheda, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Family Court No. 2, Pune...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Probate of Will in Succession Act Case — Upholds Will Execution Due to Lack of Suspicious Circumstances. The court held that the propounder of a Will need not prove the testamentary capacity of the testator beyond reasonable doubt, but only on a preponderance of probabilities, and that the Will was duly executed and attested.
24 Jan 2018The case pertains to an appeal filed by Laxman Hanchinamani against the order of the Principal District Judge, Belagavi, granting probate of a Will da...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal and Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Open Plot and Constructed Area Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court upheld enhancement for open plot and further increased compensation for constructed area based on cost and condition.
4 Jul 2017The case pertains to the acquisition of a house property bearing no. 275 admeasuring 297 sq. mtrs. (open area 53.70 sq. mtrs., constructed area 243.30...
- 31
