Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal and Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Open Plot and Constructed Area Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court upheld enhancement for open plot and further increased compensation for constructed area based on cost and condition.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to the acquisition of a house property bearing no. 275 admeasuring 297 sq. mtrs. (open area 53.70 sq. mtrs., constructed area 243.30 sq. mtrs.) situated at village Dighi, Tal. Babulgaon, District Yavatmal, for the Bembla Project. The notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on 4th February 1999. The Special Land Acquisition Officer declared the award on 10th April 2002, awarding compensation at Rs.75/- per sq. mtr. for open plot and Rs.2,210/- per sq. mtr. for constructed portion. Dissatisfied, the claimant sought reference under Section 18, and the Adhoc District Judge-1, Yavatmal, by judgment dated 20th November 2006 in Land Acquisition Case No. 425/2003, enhanced compensation to Rs.200/- per sq. mtr. for open plot and Rs.3,500/- per sq. mtr. for constructed area. The Acquiring Body (Executive Engineer, Vidarbha Irrigation Corporation) appealed against the enhancement, while the claimant filed a cross-objection seeking further enhancement. The High Court considered the evidence, including sale instances and the condition of the building. It upheld the enhancement for open plot as reasonable but further enhanced the compensation for constructed area to Rs.4,000/- per sq. mtr., considering the cost of construction and depreciation. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was partly allowed. The court directed the acquiring body to pay the enhanced compensation with statutory benefits.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation for Open Plot - Market Value Determination - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 23 and 24 - The reference court enhanced compensation for open plot from Rs.75/- per sq. mtr. to Rs.200/- per sq. mtr. based on sale instances and location. The High Court upheld the enhancement, finding it reasonable considering the property's location and potential. (Paras 4-6)

B) Land Acquisition - Compensation for Constructed Area - Valuation of Building - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 23 and 24 - The reference court enhanced compensation for constructed area from Rs.2,210/- per sq. mtr. to Rs.3,500/- per sq. mtr. The High Court further enhanced it to Rs.4,000/- per sq. mtr., considering the age, condition, and cost of construction of the building. (Paras 7-9)

C) Land Acquisition - Cross-Objection - Claim for Higher Compensation - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18 - The claimant filed cross-objection seeking further enhancement. The High Court allowed it in part, increasing compensation for constructed area but not for open plot. (Paras 10-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reference court's enhancement of compensation for open plot and constructed area was justified and whether further enhancement is warranted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Acquiring Body and partly allowed the cross-objection. The compensation for open plot was maintained at Rs.200/- per sq. mtr., and for constructed area, it was further enhanced to Rs.4,000/- per sq. mtr. The acquiring body was directed to pay the enhanced compensation with statutory benefits.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 4(1)
  • Section 18
  • Section 23
  • Section 24
  • compensation for open plot
  • compensation for constructed area
  • market value determination
  • reference court enhancement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 259

First Appeal No. 753/2008 and Cross Objection No. 35/2008

2017-07-04

Dr. Smt. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

Shri A.B. Patil, counsel for appellant; Shri V.R. Choudhari, counsel for respondent no.1/cross-objector; Shri A.R. Chutake, counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3

Executive Engineer, Vidarbha Irrigation Corporation, Bembla Project Division, Awadhootwadi, Yavatmal

Dayalal S/o Navalmal Bhansali, The State of Maharashtra, The Special Land Acquisition Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against enhancement of compensation in land acquisition and cross-objection for further enhancement.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (Acquiring Body) sought reduction of compensation; cross-objector (claimant) sought further enhancement.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the reference court's enhancement of compensation for open plot and constructed area.

Previous Decisions

Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.75/- per sq. mtr. for open plot and Rs.2,210/- per sq. mtr. for constructed area on 10/04/2002. Reference court enhanced to Rs.200/- per sq. mtr. and Rs.3,500/- per sq. mtr. respectively on 20/11/2006.

Issues

Whether the reference court's enhancement of compensation for open plot from Rs.75/- to Rs.200/- per sq. mtr. is justified? Whether the reference court's enhancement of compensation for constructed area from Rs.2,210/- to Rs.3,500/- per sq. mtr. is justified? Whether the claimant is entitled to further enhancement of compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the reference court erred in enhancing compensation without proper evidence. Cross-objector argued that the enhancement was inadequate and sought higher compensation based on market value and cost of construction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the reference court's enhancement for open plot was reasonable based on location and sale instances. For constructed area, considering the cost of construction and depreciation, further enhancement to Rs.4,000/- per sq. mtr. was justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The subject of this appeal and cross-objection is the judgment and order dated 20/11/2006, passed by Adhoc District Judge-1, Yavatmal in Land Acquisition Case No. 425/2003. By the said judgment and order, learned reference court has enhanced the amount of compensation towards open plot of land and also constructed area. Hence, being aggrieved, the Acquiring Body has preferred the appeal. At the same time, being not satisfied with the enhancement granted by the reference court on both the counts, the claimant-respondent no.1 has preferred the cross objection.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act published on 04/02/1999. Award declared by Special Land Acquisition Officer on 10/04/2002. Reference under Section 18 filed by claimant. Reference court passed judgment on 20/11/2006 enhancing compensation. Acquiring Body filed First Appeal No. 753/2008 and claimant filed Cross Objection No. 35/2008. High Court decided on 04/07/2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1), Section 18, Section 23, Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal and Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Open Plot and Constructed Area Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court upheld enhancement for open plot and further ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Father in Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Gunshot residue on accused's right hand, false suicide claim with screwdriver, and expert evidence indicating homicide established guilt beyond r...