Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

925 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 925 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Charter Hire Dispute. Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Provide for Appeal Against Interim Orders Under Section 17 of the Act.

15 Jul 2005

The case involves an appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Notice of Motion for Reference to Arbitration in Dispute Between Commodity Spot Exchange and Member. Defendant Exchange Seeks to Rely on Bye-Laws and Undertaking as Arbitration Agreement Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Deposit of Arbitral Award Amount Pending Challenge. Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not empower the court to order deposit of the award amount; it only allows interim measures of protection in respect of the subject matter of the arbitration agreement.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, M/s. AFCONS Infrastructure Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking directions aga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Apr 2026

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Most Claims but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Dispute arose from delays in crude distribution system project; court held that arbitrator's findings on delay and damages were not perverse but interest rate of 18% was excessive and reduced to 9%.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 30 June 2005 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.238 OF 2019

6 Nov 2019

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. Denial of opportunity to cross-examine key witness and failure to consider crucial evidence renders award liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Aug 2025

The dispute arose out of a contract between Unique Integrated Transport And Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner) and Mahanagar Telephone Ni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Time-Barred Counterclaim in Arbitration. Limitation for Counterclaim Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Subsequent Correspondence.

16 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from an order dated 1 October 2012 passed by a learned Single Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Broker Dispute — MOU Default Renders Agreement Void and Claimant Entitled to Recover Full Amount. The court upheld the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

24 Mar 2015

The petitioner, a share and stock broker and member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, was the original respondent in arbitration proceedings initiated by ...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)