High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"
3039 result(s) found
Found 3039 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 2A(8-a) of Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979, and Reassessment Orders Based on Change of Opinion. Petitioner Company, Engaged in Manufacture of Pan Masala Containing Tobacco, Asserts that Entry Tax on Stock Transfers Should Be Based on Stock Transfer Value, Not Prevailing Market Price, and that Reassessment After 14 Years Without Tangible Material is Invalid.
25 Apr 2024The petitioner, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of pan masala containing tobacco (guthka), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 2...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.
7 May 2026The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...
- 137
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Regularize Building Irregularities under MRTP Act. The Court examined the validity of orders passed under Sections 45 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, concerning unauthorized construction and occupation certificate refusal.
11 Jun 2012The matter involved writ petitions challenging the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited's (CIDCO) rejection of a regular...
- 48
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2011
8 Jul 2011The dispute concerns allocation of natural gas from the KG D6 fields in the Krishna-Godavari Basin, where a significant reduction in production occurr...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Permission for Alteration of Open Spaces in Housing Project — Open Spaces Sanctioned in Approved Layout Cannot Be Reduced Under Guise of Surplus Area. The Court held that purchasers of plots have a right to the open spaces as shown in the approved layout, and any deviation requires fresh approval and consent of all affected parties.
30 Sep 2022The petitioners, residents and plot owners of the project 'Aldeia de Goa' at Bambolim, challenged the permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the D...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
6 Mar 2026The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...
- 302
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Orders on Company's Petition to Quash Criminal Case for Alleged Cheating of Rs 36 Crores. Commercial Property Transaction Dispute Resulted in FIR; Petitioners Claim Abuse of Process Amid Pending Civil and Insolvency Proceedings.
6 Aug 2024The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by Patel Engineering Limited an...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.
29 May 2026The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...
- 359
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by State Authority Against Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor for Repair of Minor Irrigation Tanks. Court upholds award of interest and costs under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.
29 Jan 2026The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by the Appellants (Chief Engineer and Chief Administrator, Command Area Development Authority, Aur...
- 113
