CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "tax entry"
1501 result(s) found
Found 1501 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.
25 Feb 2005The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Eligibility Certificate Under 1988 Industrial Package Scheme. The Court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.
21 Aug 2023The petitioner, M/s. Nav Maharashtra Cement Industries, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition un...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Restoration of Khatha and Acceptance of Property Tax. Deletion of Khatha Without Notice Violates Natural Justice Under Section 108-A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.
26 Oct 2016The petitioner, Mr. Jai M. Patil, is the owner of Flat No.S-3, measuring 2000 sq. ft., situated on the second floor of 'Pratham Enclave' apartment in ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.
4 May 2018These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.
7 Oct 2019The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.
18 Jul 2023The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...
- 151
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence and Criminal Appeals in Murder of Medical Officer. The court decides to first adjudicate the appeals against conviction before considering confirmation under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
17 Dec 2014The case arises from the disappearance and murder of Dr. Vijaya Chaudhari, a Medical Officer at Civil Hospital, Jalgaon, on 12 March 2012. Her husband...
- 25
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.
10 Dec 2019The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...
- 202
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Revisional Jurisdiction and Denies Exemption for Brass Sheets Not Specified in Eligibility Certificate under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that revisional power under Section 57 can be exercised despite pending appeals, and exemption benefits require strict compliance with the eligibility certificate's specified goods.
26 Feb 2015The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between M/s. Jitendra R. Gandhi (the assessee...
- 95
